For my first constellation term, I’ll be looking into The Body in Art, Design and Society. We looked into how the first ever recorded plastic surgery was in 600 BC, which was a nose reconstruction; a technology we think of as a modern invention. We also looked into the 4 Humorial System, which linked someone’s illness as something given to them from God for an immoral action, and other different ways people have seen the body in history and how that impacted medicine and technological advances.
We’ve been asked to look up pictures that show a relationship between the body and Fine Art, so I chose a painting by Picasso called Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, showing how abstract an artist could transform a human body, by creating them into sharp shapes, which seems unnatural but they still look human. The second image I chose is the portrait of Anne of Cleaves, which is a great example of how paintings were altered to not look identical to those who were painted, but to make them look better; similar to what we have today, from photoshop to instagram filters. Henry V111 agreed to marrying her from looking at a painting of her but later described her as looking like a “horse” when they met and ended the marriage.
The image below is a ‘selfie’ of myself, which I have uploaded onto my Instagram account and used ‘filter’ on it, a form of changing the lighting to make you appear better looking.
By putting up a ‘selfie’, or any other picture of yourself, it’s on the internet permanently and that picture has now made you an object; you are owned by social media. Therefore, as an object, it can never be an owner, can’t be free or communicate, merely making us still property. We willfully allow this to happen because, otherwise, we’re ‘missing out’ or ‘out of the loop’, thus feel compelled to contribute to this cycle. This means that the audience, who can see the image (practically anyone with access to the internet) are able to say anything about the image and perhaps use if for something, leaving us vulnerable. I also edited this photo of myself by using the social media app called ‘Instagram’, which objectifies me even more by making me more ‘acceptable’ to society as a product to be consumed by spectators behind their screens.
The opposite of this, which could perhaps be social media/the audience who view your image, is a ‘subject’. They are powerful through the freedom of not being owned and can communicate freely.
Hegemony- Leadership or dominance, especially by one state or social group over others. An example of this is Hegenomic Masculinity; A developing debate within the growing theoretical literature on men and masculinity concerns the relationship of gender systems to the social formation. Crucially at issue is the question of the autonomy of the gender order. Some, in particular Waters, are of the opinion that change in masculine gender systems historically has been caused exogenously and that, without those external factors, the systems would stably reproduce.For Hochschild, the “motor” of this social change is the economy, particularly and currently, the decline in the purchasing power of the male wage, the decline in the number and proportion of “male” skilled and unskilled jobs, and the rise in “female” jobs in the growing services sector. On the other side of the argument, others have been trying to establish “the laws of motion” of gender systems. Connell, for instance, has insisted on the independence of their structures, patterns of movement. and determinations, most notably in his devastating critiques of sexrole theory. “Change is always something that happens to sex roles, that impinges on them. It comes from outside, as in discussions of how technological and economic changes demand a shift to a ‘modern’ male role for men. Or it comes from inside the person, from the ‘real self’ that protests against the artificial restrictions of constraining roles. Sex role theory has no way of grasping change as a dialectic arising within gender relations themselves.”
Binary-The gender binary is a term used to describe the practice of only recognizing two distinct genders. You deviate from the heteronormative standard by being non-binary, or even simply performing gender in a way that doesn’t subscribe to a strict separation of “man” or “woman” (and the assumption that “masculinity” should only be performed by the former and “femininity” by the latter).
Heteronormativity- (Warner,1991) Strict norms of different genders (male and female) and that heterosexuality is the ‘norm’. Heteronormativity, then, is a system that works to normalize behaviors and societal expectations that are tied to the presumption of heterosexuality and an adherence to a strict gender binary.
http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/07/what-is-heteronormativity/
http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1149&context=artspapers
For my essay on The Body, my main focus will be on the female body and how it’s controlled by the government, cultures, religion, etc. I’ll be looking into the control over women’s bodies throughout history up until the present day. I’ve ordered a book through Cardiff Metropolitan’s library called ‘Theorizing the Young Woman in the Body, Body and Society, Vol II’ by Dr L Frost, which is exactly what I need for my essay because I’ll be thoroughly researching how society sees and treats women from all cultures, especially looking into how we treat women seeking abortions or escaping child marriages and FGM. I will need to gather as much information as possible to create a convincing argument on such a controversial and sensitive subject.
Affordance, Conventions and Design by Donald A. Norman
We live in a world which has objects in it which all contain affordance. We learn to communicate with them and to not deliberately bump into them by encountering objects with possibilities for action, i.e. handles for pushing, pulling, picking, etc. Therefore, when something is afforded, it is given a possibility for action. The design of something conveys information (visual clues) to us to know how to use it. When we pull a handle down, it’s a part of perception affordance. The difference between actual affordance and perception affordance is how an object contains actual affordance but perception affordance is playing around with the object to understand it and its actual affordance. We understand what to do with objects by using our bodies and knowledge of what we can see.